Richard Verkley – An inspiring all-rounder

Overview:

Richard Verkley is an inspiring Ecuador based businessman and also the Chief Executive Officer of Focal Point International. He is an aspiring entrepreneur for most of the people looking to make big name in the business sector. Richard Verkley was awarded a couple of awards because for his sheer determination and immense success in his business. He is also a renowned philanthropist in Ecuador, where he did great charitable work for the local community by forming different organizations. He works extremely hard for the welfare and support of the local people but he is still not much successful as a philanthropist as much as he is as a businessman.

Focusing on the importance of buying small franchises:

Mr. Richard Verkley success is mostly because of his great managerial skills and his ability to take the right decisions at the right time. He has a very deep experience when it comes to the franchise buying business. He accumulated many small franchises to become part of his business. He mentors a lot of other people and encourages them to buy small renowned franchises to make a big impact. He just advises other amateur businessmen to make wise decisions after doing a proper analysis of the business. Buying a small franchise is a great idea according to him because the business owner doesn’t need to spend too much on marketing as everything has already been done. He just needs to have good management skills to run the business successfully. The team running the franchise should be highly professional with exceptional set of management skills.

Heats of Gold charity project by Richard Verkley:

The first major success or breakthrough in the career of Richard Verkley came through his Gold and Silver shop. They started off by sponsoring the major Christmas events such as the Christmas gold for children program which helped them a great deal in collecting funds from the people. The funds collected were donated to 3 orphanage homes in Ecuador for the benefit of orphans. This program was a huge success and Richard Verkley was well appreciated for his efforts. Soon after this huge success, Mr. Verkley inaugurated his very own ‘Heart of Gold Foundation’ and everything after this was done in a more organized and systematic way. The primary aim of the Foundation was to make them literate which would eventually help them to break the poverty cycle which they are currently going through. The operations of the foundation are expected to reach the countrywide communities very soon. Mr. Verkley also announced that he will give a certain percentage of all his earning to the charity that he is running.

Verkley Richard Focal Point International

IS "THE POEM OF THE MAN-GOD" SIMPLY A BAD NOVEL? 
 
Maria Valtorta's multi-volume life of Jesus flirts with heresy and 
exhibits bad taste. Its claim to authenticity have been rejected by Rome. 
 
by Father Mitch Pacwa, S.J. 
 
"The Poem of the Man-God" is a five-volume "narrative" of the life of 
Jesus written in the 1940s by a sickly Italian woman named Maria Valtorta. 
"Poem" purports to fill in the details of Jesus' life left blank by the 
four Gospels. Such narratives have been produced since the second century 
A.D. Some were written by gnostic heretics. Some by New Agers and 
occultists. And some were produced by pious Christians who made up stories 
about Jesus to edify their readers and listeners. 
 
The four Gospels do not give a biography of Jesus--or of anyone else in 
His life. Their purpose is evangelical and theological--to proclaim the 
Good News that human beings need for their salvation. Thus, for centuries, 
the "hidden life" of Jesus has been the subject for speculation. 
 
"The Poem of the Man-God" is in this tradition of apocryphal literature on 
New Testament themes. Valtorta claimed that she was the "secretary" of 
Jesus and Mary, and was setting down the divinely inspired truth about 
Jesus' life. The Church has rejected this claim. Nevertheless, "Poem" has 
become quite popular, particularly among Catholics as well. 
 
Remarkably, the book has grown in popularity in part because its champions 
claim that high Church officials--including one Pope--endorsed it. They 
haven't. In fact, "Poem" was included on the Index of Forbidden books 
until the abolition of the Index in the 1960s. No less an authority than 
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of 
the Faith, reiterates the Church's rejection of the claims made for "The 
Poem of the Man-God." 
 
How did "The Poem of the Man-God" come to be, and how has the notion 
become widely accepted that it contains important religious truth? 
 
Maria Valtorta, author of "Poem," was born in 1897 into a sadly 
dysfunctional family, where she suffered emotional abuse at the hands of a 
despotic mother. When she was 23, she was attacked and beaten by a mugger. 
She was never completely well after that.  From 1933 on, she was unable to 
leave her bed. 
 
Maria began to receive "dictations" on Good Friday, 1943. In 1947, she 
handed over 10,000 handwritten pages to her spiritual director, Father 
Romuald Migliorini, O.S.M.  Father Migliorini typed them and Father 
Corrado Berti, O.S.M. bound them. Fr. Berti, brought them to Father later 
Cardinal Augustin Bea, S.J., spiritual director to Pope Pius XII. 
 
Did Pope Pius read the whole manuscript or parts? If only part, which 
part?  Advertisements by the Canadian Central distributors for Valtorta 
(CEDIVAL) quote Father Bea: "I have read in typed manuscripts many of the 
books written by Maria Valtorta . . . As far as exegesis is concerned, I 
did not find any errors in the parts which I examined." Notice, he read 
only parts of the books. Which were they? 
 
On Feb. 26, 1948, Fathers Migliorini, Berti and A. Cecchin enjoyed a 
private audience with Pope Pius XII, as listed in L'Osservatore Romano's 
daily announcement of audiences. Standing in St. Peter's Square after the 
audience, Father Berti wrote down Pope Pius' words as he remembered them. 
These words were "not" printed in L'Osservatore Romano, but Father Berti 
remembered the Pope saying: 
 
"Publish this work as it is. There is no need to give an opinion about its 
origin, whether it be extraordinary or not. Who reads it, will understand. 
One hears of many visions and revelations. I will not say they are all 
authentic; but there are some of which it could be said that they are." 
 
CEDIVAL calls this a "Supreme Pontifical Imprimatur," where "he took upon 
himself to pass the first official judgment on these writings." CEDIVAL 
glues this inside the cover, though the publisher does not print an 
imprimatur. The reason: it has none! 
 
Confident of papal approval, Father Berti brought the books to the Vatican 
press.  However, in 1949, two commissioners of the Holy Office, Msgr. 
Giovanni Pepe and Father Berruti, O.P., condemned the "Poem," ordering 
Berti to hand over every copy and sign an agreement not to publish it. 
Father Berti returned the manuscripts to Valtorta and handed over only his 
typed versions. 
 
Despite his signed promise, in 1952 Father Berti went to publisher 
Emiliano Pisani.  Though aware of the Holy Office's opposition, Pisani 
printed the first volume in 1956, and a new volume each year through 1959. 
 
When volume four appeared, the Holy Office examined the "Poem" and 
condemned it, recommending that it be placed on the Index of Forbidden 
Books Dec. 16, 1959. Pope John XXIII signed the decree and ordered it 
published. L'Osservatore Romano, on Jan.  6, 1960, printed the 
condemnation with an accompanying front-page article, "A Badly 
Fictionalized Life of Jesus," to explain it. 
 
The article complained that the "Poem" broke Canon Law. "Though they treat 
exclusively of religious issues, these volumes do not have an 
"imprimatur," which is required by Canon 1385, sect. 1, n. 2." 
 
Second, the long speeches of Jesus and Mary starkly contrast with the 
evangelists, who portray Jesus as "humble, reserved; His discourses are 
lean, incisive." Valtorta's fictionalized history makes Jesus sound "like 
a chatterbox, always ready to proclaim Himself the Messiah and the Son of 
God," or teach theology in modern terms. The Blessed Mother speaks like a 
"propagandist" for modern Marian theology. 
 
Third, "some passages are rather risque," like the "immodest" dance before 
Pilate (vol.  5, p. 73). There are "many historical, geographical and 
other blunders." For instance, Jesus uses screwdrivers (Vol. 1, pp. 195, 
223), centuries before screws existed. 
 
There are theological errors, as when "Jesus says" (vol. 1, p. 30) that 
Eve's temptation consisted in arousing her flesh, as the serpent 
sensuously "caressed" her. While she "began the sin by herself," she 
"accomplished it with her companion." Sun Myung Moon and Maria Valtorta 
may claim the first sin was sexual, but Scripture does not. 
 
Vol. 1, p. 7, oddly claims, "Mary can be called the 'second-born' of the 
Father . . ." Her explanation limits the meaning, avoiding evidence of an 
authentic heresy; but it does not take away the basic impression that she 
wants to construct a new mariology, which simply goes beyond the limits of 
propriety." "Another strange and imprecise statement" made of Mary (vol. 
4, p. 240) is that she will "be second to Peter with regard to 
ecclesiastical hierarchy. . . " Our Lady surpasses St. Peter's holiness, 
but she is not in the hierarchy, let alone second to St. Peter. 
 
Further, Valtorta did not claim to write a novel, but called herself a 
"secretary" of Jesus and Mary, so, "in all parts on reads the words 'Jesus 
says. . .' or 'Mary says . . .'" The Church takes this claim to revelation 
very seriously, since it has the God-given duty to discern what is or is 
not truly from the Holy Spirit. In Valtorta's case, the Church decided 
against Divine inspiration. 
 
Finally, "Poem" is condemned for reasons of disobedience. Competent Church 
authority had prohibited the printing of Valtorta's work. 
 
Pope John's approval of the condemnation of the "Poem of the Man-God" 
should have ended the issue, but it did not. The publishers printed a 
second edition of 10 volumes, which the Church condemned in another 
front-page article in L'Osservatore Romano, Dec. 1, 1961. This second 
Italian edition was later translated into German, French, Spanish and 
English. 
 
CEDIVAL asserts that a "modernist clan in the Church" . . . 
"surreptitiously attempted to seize the manuscripts and destroy them," 
claiming "firsthand documentation on this." These "enemies" included Msgr. 
Pepe and Father Berruti, the Holy Office censors. 
 
I asked the head of CEDIVAL, Prof. Leo Brodeur, for evidence that Msgr. 
Pepe and Father Berruti held any modernist heresies, but he had none. He 
assumed they were modernists because the "Poem" claims "to help the Church 
fight against the terrible heresy of modernism." If the "Poem's enemies 
are modernists, Msgr. Pepe and Father Berruti must be modernists, too. 
 
Such assertions are unacceptable. Accusations of modernism or any other 
heresy without proof is slander. 
 
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, present head of the Sacred Congregation for the 
Doctrine of the Faith (formerly the same office that condemned the 
"Poem"), informed Cardinal Siri in 1985 of the "Poem's condemnation: 
 
After the dissolution of the Index, when some people thought the printing 
and distribution of the work was permitted, they were reminded again in 
L'Osservatore Romano (June 15, 1966) that "The Index retains its moral 
force despite its dissolution." 
 
More recently (April 17, 1993, Prot. N. 144/58i), he wrote: 
 
"The 'visions' and 'dictations' referred to in the work, "The Poem of the 
Man-God," are simply the literary forms used by the author to narrate in 
her own way the life of Jesus.  They cannot be considered supernatural in 
origin." 
 
The best that can be said for "The Poem of the Man-God" is that it is a 
bad novel. This was summed up in the L'Osservatore Romano headline, which 
called the book "A Badly Fictionalized Life of Jesus." 
 
At worst, "Poem's" impact is more serious. Though many people claim that 
"Poem" helps their faith or their return to reading Scripture, they are 
still being disobedient to the Church's decisions regarding the reading of 
"Poem." How can such disregard for Church authority and wisdom be a help 
in renewing the Church in these difficult times? 
 
When Catholics insist on reading "Poem," despite Church condemnation, I 
make these requests: First, read three hours of Scripture for every one 
hour spent in the "Poem." The Church guarantees that the Bible is God's 
Word, inspired by the Holy Spirit. The Church has judged the "Poem" to be 
a poorly done human work. Second, read solid Catholic theology books in 
addition to Scripture. G.K. Chesterton, Frank Sheed, Archbishop Sheen's 
"Life of Christ" and many other works are excellent starts. Third, 
maintain a strong prayer life, drawing closer to Christ Jesus, Our Lord, 
at Mass and at eucharistic adoration, and to our Blessed Mother Mary, 
especially in the Rosary. 
 
If sheep insist on bad pasturage, at least let them take antidotes. 
 
This article appeared in February 1994 edition of "New Covenant"